Humoral and cellular response of two different vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in a group of healthcare workers: An observational study.

On March 13, 2021, Tunisia started a widespread immunization program against SARS-CoV-2 utilizing different vaccinations that had been given emergency approval. Herein, we followed prospectively a cohort of participant who received COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer BioNTech and Sputnik-Gameleya V). The goal of this follow-up was to define the humoral and cellular immunological profile after immunization by assessing neutralizing antibodies and IFN- γ release. 26 vaccinated health care workers by Pfizer BioNTech (n=12) and Sputnik-Gameleya V (n=14) were enrolled from June to December 2021 in Military hospital of Tunis. All consenting participants were sampled for peripheral blood after three weeks of vaccination. The humoral response was investigated by the titer of anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies to S1 protein. The CD4 and CD8 T cell responses were evaluated by the QuantiFERON® SARS-CoV-2 (Qiagen® Basel, Switzerland). Regardless the type of vaccine, the assessment of humoral and cellular response following vaccination showed a strong involvement of the later with expression of IFN-γ as compared to antibodies secretion. Moreover, we showed that people with past SARS-CoV-2 infection developed high levels of antibodies than those who are not previously infected. However, no significant difference was detected concerning interferon gamma (IFN-γ) expression by CD4 and CD8 T cells in health care worker (HCW) previously infection or not with COVID-19 infection. Analysis of immune response according to the type of vaccine, we found that Pfizer BioNTech induced high level of humoral response (91.66%) followed by Sputnik-Gameleya V (64.28%). However, adenovirus vaccine gave a better cellular response (57.14%) than mRNA vaccine (41.66%). Regarding the immune response following vaccine doses, we revealed a significant increase of neutralizing antibodies and IFN-γ release by T cells in patients fully vaccinated as compared to those who have received just one vaccine. Collectively, our data revealed a similar immune response between Pfizer BioNTech and Sputnik-Gameleya V vaccine with a slight increase of humoral response by mRNA vaccine and cellular response by adenovirus vaccine. It's evident that past SARS-CoV-2 infection was a factor that contributed to the vaccination's increased immunogenicity. However, the administration of full doses of vaccines (Pfizer BioNTech or Sputnik-Gameleya V) induces better humoral and cellular responses detectable even more than three months following vaccination.

Immune Cell Response during COVID-19 Infection and following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit.

Background: Immune response plays a crucial role in virus clearance during COVID-19 infection and underpins vaccine efficacy. Herein, we aimed to assess the immune response during COVID-19 infection and following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Methods: In this retrospective study, 94 confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit were categorized into unvaccinated patients (n = 50), including 33 deceased and 17 discharged patients, and vaccinated group (n = 44) with 26 deceased and 18 discharged patients. Records of patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to the ICU between March, 2021 and March, 2022 were gathered and analyzed. Result: The assessment of immune cell counts revealed a large rise of neutrophils associated to decrease number of lymphocytes in patients with COVID-19 infection. In dead patients, we detected a significant correlation between neutrophils and inflammatory parameters such as IL-6 and CRP. Moreover, analysis of immune cell count following vaccination did not reveal any significant difference. However, the most substantial result, herein, detected is the decrease level of IL-6 in vaccinated patients as compared to unvaccinated. The reduce level of IL-6 following vaccination is observed in discharged patients as compared to deceased. Regarding the level of mortality after vaccination, we showed that all patients who received the first dose were died (46.1%, n = 12) as compared to those who have received two doses (34.6%, n = 9) and the third dose of vaccine (19.23%, n = 3) (p=0.0018). Strikingly, studying the inflammatory parameters after each vaccine dose, we revealed a significant decrease of IL-6 level after the booster dose (third dose), especially in vaccinated discharged patients. Conclusions: Neutrophils combined with IL-6 and CRP can be very useful markers to predict disease severity in patients admitted to ICU. The decrease level of IL-6 in vaccinated group pointed out the impact of vaccination to prevent inflammatory cytokine release.

COVID-19 prophylaxis with doxycycline and zinc in health care workers: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the efficacy of a combination treatment of doxycycline and zinc in the primary prevention of COVID-19 infection in Tunisian health care workers compared with two control groups. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial over 5 months to determine the efficacy of a preventive combination treatment dose of doxycycline (100 mg/day) and zinc (15 mg/day), compared with a single-dose treatment with doxycycline versus placebo. The effectiveness of preventive treatment was measured by the significant decline in the number of cases of COVID-19 infection and/or a decrease in the viral load as determined by SARS-CoV-2 cycle threshold value using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction tests. RESULTS: We detected a significant decrease of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the group that received both doxycycline and zinc compared with other participants. We also demonstrated that COVID-19 infection was neither associated with diabetes (P = 0.51) nor associated with hypertension (P = 0.99), asthma (P = 0.52), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = 0.27). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated that preventive therapy reduced the risk of SARS-CoV-2. These results suggest that the combination of doxycycline and zinc has a protective effect in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Performance of Sepsis-3 Definitions in a Middle Income Country Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: Since they were first published in 2016, Sepsis-3 definitions have not been universally accepted. Rather, they have become a source of controversy because the clinical and laboratory parameters used had been derived mainly from patients hospitalized in Intensive Care Units (ICU) in the United States. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Sepsis-3 definitions for the prediction of ICU-mortality in a Tunisian ICU population as compared to the 2003 Consensus Definitions (Sepsis-2 definitions). METHOD: The study, conducted in an 18-bed medical-surgical ICU at the Military Hospital of Tunis (Tunisia), was retrospective in nature. From January 2012 to January 2016, all patients admitted to the ICU for sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock as defined according to the 2003 Consensus Definitions (Sepsis-2 consensus) were eligible for this study. The new Sepsis-3 definition was then used to classify the included patients. The primary area of interest was ICU mortality, defined as death before ICU discharge. RESULTS: A total of 1080 patients were included during the recruitment period. When Sepsis-2 definitions were used, there was a difference in mortality only between septic shock and sepsis patients. Sepsis-3 definitions show that mortality increased from 16 % among no-dysfunction-infected patients to 30 % among patients with qSOFA ≥ 2 and 44% and 46% for sepsis or septic shock patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sepsis-3 definitions were better than sepsis-2 definitions at stratifying mortality among septic patients admitted to an ICU of a middle-income country (Tunisia).